Mar 182013
 

Beginners to genealogy are often very excited to find family trees extending back several more generations from grandparents or great grandparents. Wow – there are names, approximate birth years, and more details. It immediately fills in your family line on one side of your family. Great – now you can brush your hands off and go look for more information for one of your other family lines.

But, wait a minute here before you copy or merge that new-found family tree with yours. How can you be certain that those ancestors are truly yours? That any of the details are even correct?

You may find – as I did – that an online family tree had the wrong great-grandmother for one family line of mine. That error meant that many other people had copied the incorrect information into their own family trees, adding several generations of the wrong ancestors. Whoops! How did I know it was an error? Because we had a family story of my great grandfather’s wife’s family having a “Grover” as a maiden name several generations back… plus there were totally different family first names in my family line. More searching online, with details of marriages, and it became clear where my great grandmother’s family line came from: Buell, not Doolittle. By going up and then down the family line, I was able to confirm detail after detail with documents and registrations, plus obituaries, in order to be certain of the accuracy of my results. As you can imagine, I learned a great deal with this research project!

One of the things that will strike you as you look at online trees, is that many people simply copy one person’s family tree. So there may be 15 family trees all saying exactly the same thing about names/dates/places… But that may be the result of 14 copies of one original. The fact that there are many copies does not make the original, true!

How can you tell if this wealth of detail you found is correct for your family tree? There is only one way: verify each of the details with original source material if at all possible. An excellent source could be birth registrations (government or church) which list both parents including maiden names of mothers. Other sources may include the following: gravestones, church registers, pension records, census records over several decades, or marriage registrations which also may list both parties’ parents names and birthplaces or residences. Once you are back to the early 1800s or before that time, it may be quite challenging to find sources, but keep digging and you may find treasure.

At times, there may be published histories or genealogies of particular towns or villages which detail some of your ancestors. As the histories were often written about 80-100 years or more after the fact, taken from sources you may not be able to find or read, you will need to consider them secondary sources which will still need more verification. In the late 1800s in the United States, for example, family genealogies became very popular and many families had “professionals” write out their family tree in detail. Some of these are very well researched, and the sources used are detailed in the published material. Others are based on hearsay and conjecture, and contain many errors. The further back in time, the more likely there are to be errors of various kinds.

For example, in one family line of mine, there are many Grover Buell men, generation after generation, through siblings and side-lines. So many of them, born close together in time and place, that some histories have condensed several of them into one, thinking that “someone” made a mistake with the dates etc. I have had to list each one and research each one to be sure I have “my” Grover Buell! Luckily, others have been doing some of the research as well, and share their results online. We have shared finding gravestones with the correct person and his wife, and documents of tax rolls and more. “Cousins” online are so helpful!

That said about pitfalls, there are often very accurate family trees online, that have been researched well, and have source material attached to individuals in the trees. For instance, a published history details when an ancestor first came to a newly carved out village in Connecticut, names his sons and their ages at the time, describes his occupation over time, and his daughters’ married names. Wow – what a find! And there are additional details found in the village’s church registers of each person, marriages, their children, plus deaths and burials. Even a few gravestone photographs. Confirmation of details is so exciting!

One of my family lines joined up with a well-known surname family line which had been researched extensively. As the surname organization had original sources and details verified, I was able to merge safely and accurately with that ancestor’s descendants. For the challenge, I still researched through the direct line to be sure that in fact the family tree worked in both directions, up and down, and there were primary sources to support the details. Yes it did, and I was thrilled to find so much interesting information on that family line.

If you find a family tree line which merges with one of your line, take the time to write the person who has input the details, asking for their research or sources of the information. Several times I’ve received a response of “I can’t remember where I found this information but it was online somewhere.” Oh dear. Now you will need to be very creative looking for those records. Of course, this will remind you that you must make certain that if YOU find a source for details, you will definitely copy the source and webpage address into the individual’s record for future reference.

As you can see, there are wonderful possibilities when searching online for family tree information. And of course, there are challenging pitfalls as well. Never use online trees as “sources” for your family tree details: they should be considered as tentative guidelines for your further researches, instead. Once you can verify details with other documents and sources, you will be able to cite those sources for others researching the same line as your family ancestors. Plus you will be certain of the accuracy of your family tree. Happy searching.

Oct 272012
 

As a beginner in genealogy, you may have found several family trees online that appear to relate to your ancestors, or they include many of the same names. The details seem more or less right with what you have found to date, although perhaps a few names do not quite match, and you did not think your great grandmother had that many children… But still, they could be your ancestors, and it looks like them. Yes, William and Susan Morris in 1850 Pennsylvania USA, or George Bunn in 1861 Dudley, Worcester, England. But are these your ancestors -? How can you tell for certain? Here are three general points regarding copying online trees into your genealogy.

#1 Quality Sources.

First you need to see a quality source for the relationships between people in the family tree online. If there is no source or document proving the relationships, then all details are suspect. And, do NOT assume accuracy simply because there are 18 individuals listing these very same names/dates/places online. Seventeen people may have simply copied one tree that someone uploaded 8 years ago and never corrected – and no one tried to find any sources! This is a major error in genealogy!

Look for original quality primary source material to identify and confirm the relationships between these ancestors and yours. In other words, search for original documentation of births and marriages in particular. Remember that Primary sources are those items which were developed at the time of an event: e.g., a birth registration, or a marriage record, or parish record.

Secondary sources may help to confirm information, and you will need to evaluate the accuracy of details, e.g., from a census, comparing those details to the online tree you have found. More examples, such as a census, a draft card, a gravestone, a village history: all of these may provide you with some details you can compare to online trees. Follow the individual details to see if it is possible that the online tree individuals are actually your ancestors, or not. They will help you evaluate the accuracy of the trees you have found online.

#2 Names, Names, and more about Names.

Spelling was weird and wonderful for many years, as few individuals were educated and literate. By the early to mid-1850s, most people could read and write, and spelling of names became standardized. This means you may need to be somewhat creative about how your ancestors may have spelled their names, both first names and surnames. Someone is not necessarily NOT in your tree because they spelled their surname differently from your parents, nor are they necessarily IN your tree simply because they spell it the same!

Naming patterns may help you evaluate whether a family tree contains your ancestors. For example, it was relatively common to follow a naming pattern in the 1700 and 1800s: e.g., first son named for father’s father, first daughter named for mother’s mother, second son named for mother’s father, second daughter for father’s mother. But sometimes, children were named after the father or mother’s siblings – a very common practice, making it quite challenging to follow the ‘correct’ ancestors!

Maiden names of mother or grandmother (on either side) may be incorporated into a first name or middle name – a great clue to follow. If you see a very unusual first or second name, check to see if it shows up a generation or two back; e.g., Arthur Aiken Lewis – that Aiken looks like a surname to me… Yes, his mother’s maiden name. Another example: Whitehead Joyner… again, that Whitehead looks like a surname, and indeed it was – his mother’s maiden name. Grover Buell… surname? Yes, but I had to go back 4 generations to find the Grover! And in the intervals, there were many many Grover Buell individuals who were likely cousins as well as direct ancestors – very confusing.

And, you will likely find that families tended to use fairly similar names from one generation to another. If your 3rd great grandparents named their children George, John, Joseph, Mary, Ann, Elizabeth, etc. – then if you find the online tree contains the next generation children named Carson, Octavius, Elijah, Nancy, Lucinda, Isabella – something does not match, and it is possible that this online tree is not “yours” because the patterns are quite different. It is not always true, but in general, families tended to follow similar name groupings for their children.

#3 Surname Family Associations.

These are wonderful – and highly variable, as well. Check to see if any of your ancestor surnames have an association online which has high quality research on family lines. Either search for a “surname+family association”, or go to the Guild of One Name Studies, and search through there. Actually, I usually do both, as some surname associations are quite small and run by only one individual. By checking online, I was able to confirm many details of ancestors in several lines: Terwilliger, Graves, Merwin, Rice, White, Vineyard.

Also look for histories published on individuals (e.g., Miles Merwin association), on villages, counties, and more for additional details you can use to confirm or discard online family trees as your ancestors. For example, I was able to trace one line of Rice individuals to a Edmund Rice association… but noticed that his grandson married the granddaughter of a Mayflower descendant! Both lines had excellent documentation and the connection was quite clear – amazing serendipity.

As you can see, there are some pitfalls as well as wonderful possibilities in following online family trees for your ancestors. Never take someone else’s online tree as correct, until you have evaluated the sources of their information for yourself. By taking time to confirm the details, you can be more sure of the accuracy of your final tree, and be very proud of your work.

Jun 262012
 

We all have them: an ancestor with birthdate and marriage “known” to everyone in the family. But we cannot find other details on any registration document, and we have not been able to find their birth certificate. We are stuck – we can’t go further back in the line, because we have no identifying information to search on. What to do next? Use siblings.

As a beginner in genealogy searching, you will have learned the basic rule: work backwards from what you know, to be sure you are finding the correct ancestors. But once you are two or three generations back, it may be useful at times to go sideways at times rather than in a straight line backwards.

For example, if you know your great-grandmother’s full name (wonderful information), and you have a birthdate (1864) and possible residence, hold that information on a piece of paper while you look at other details of the family. The problem may be that you do not have her mother’s name, and therefore you cannot go further backwards. You would like to find her birth certificate which would have both of her parents listed, with her mother’s maiden name as well. Luckily you may be able to find a later Census record with other siblings names and ages listed, for the same district.

If any one of those individuals has a somewhat unusual name, or is the only one listed in a search of the area at the time of his/her likely year – you have hit treasure! For example, your great-grandmother may be Elizabeth Eileen Felty, born 8 Oct 1864 in Barrow in Furness, Lancashire England. And when you search, you find there are 4 Elizabeth Felty births! How to get the correct birth registration without paying for four of them! Ah, but you find that she has three siblings listed with her on the 1881 Census, and two of them have less common names: Sophia aged 13, and Beatrice aged 9. (note: these are examples only, not actual persons)

Using those two girls’ details, search backwards for their birth registration in free BMD (Free birth, marriage, death records). This site is a database which can be searched by name, date range, and place, and consists of records which have been transcribed by volunteers; you can also look at the actual records once you find someone. Or, you can search on the FamilySearch website for their database records of birth registrations for the area, as well.

You may find that there is only one of either Sophia or Beatrice Felty in the correct place and year. Goldmine. You can request one of those children’s birth certificates, sure that they are in fact your great-grandmother’s siblings, and there will be your next generation back.

Now that you have your great-grandmother’s mother’s maiden name, you can search again for her birth registration with the correct parents’ names. Once you have that wonderfully detailed document, you are ready to continue searching. You can now be certain of the correct marriage registration document, and can request a copy of that as well. And with the marriage document, will come both bride and groom parents’ names (or at least, the father’s name).

Each correct document you find will provide you with more clues to find other elusive ancestors in your family tree. Whenever you seem to be hitting a brick wall – as we all do – try the technique of searching sideways for more details. You will be amazed at the great wealth of information you can find on your ancestors, by doing so.

May 152012
 

Have you ever wondered just where your ancestors lived, and what their homes looked like? This is one of the questions that inevitably will arise in a genealogical search, but it also comes into play in getting better acquainted with parents and grandparents, and discovering what their surroundings were like when they were growing up. Understanding their particular circumstances, in the greater social and historical context, can provide a great deal of insight into their background and how they functioned within their society. It also can provide a basis for the genesis of attitudes and outlooks on life which may have been passed down through a number of generations.

My parents both were children of Ontario pioneers, who helped open up the northern part of the province in the early 1900s. Carving out a living in the forested lands was not easy, and led to the development of a strong work ethic in my parents and their siblings. My father’s childhood home is still standing, as is his father’s. I remember visiting both farms as a child, although at the time, the significance of my great-grandparents’ farmhouse and homestead (at that time inhabited by my aunt and her husband), as the place where the family settled in Canada, were lost on me. That property has been in the family since before 1899, when my great-grandparents, recently arrived from England, purchased it from my great-grandmother’s cousin, who was moving west to homestead.

On my mother’s side, my maternal grandmother’s parental home still exists in southern Ontario, and until fairly recently, was still owned by a descendant. My maternal grandfather came to Canada in the late 1800s with his mother and stepfather. The family home was on an island, which I have not yet visited, as it is accessible only by boat.

I am quite disappointed that the family home in which my mother grew up no longer exists, although there are a number of photographs, and a painting or two, of the old home, which was the site of so many of the stories I heard as a child. My husband and I recently visited the site, at the top of a hill overlooking the village in the valley below. We drove in via what clearly was once a lane, but the only evidence we could see of past human habitation was a large patch of rhubarb growing amid the weeds and scrub. It is such a sad, deserted, desolate place now, where a large family of happy, lively, mischievous children once did their chores, played on the rocks and in the barn, explored in the forest, and walked along the road to the schoolhouse in the village! The contrast reminds me of the James Lumbers paintings, with ghostly images of past times superimposed on images of the present.

In 2005, I decided to visit England and take a look at the villages where some of my ancestors had lived. One of my cousins, also a genealogy buff, happened to be in England at the same time with his wife. We arranged to visit the family home of an ancestor in Yorkshire. A seventh cousin lives in what used to be the farmworkers’ quarters, and he showed us around the lovely property and other family holdings in the area, some having been in the family since the 1300s. I remember standing in the back yard of the main home looking out over the rolling hills, and being struck with the realization that an ancestor some 500 years before had lived on this property, and had looked out over those same hills! It was quite an emotional moment – somewhat eerie, somewhat humbling, and definitely elating and exciting, all at the same time. In the short time I had been in England, I had noted a strong sense of history in general, with its many buildings dating back a thousand years or more; but this was personal – a connection with my own forebears, going back hundreds of years, which I had not felt before.

In a more recent quest, my mother-in-law indicated that she was travelling to Norfolk, England, from where both she and a number of my paternal forebears had originated. She offered to go to the village where my great-grandfather and three generations before him had lived, and to take photos of the homes in which they had lived, if I could determine from the census or other documents which houses they were. (My husband and I had visited the village in 2005, but, with the limited time available, took only a few photos in the town before moving on). At first, I thought that would be an easy task. However, I soon discovered that the earlier census documents listed no street numbers or names; all streets, other than the main road which ran along the edge of the village green, were identified as “Back Street”. The more recent census documents did identify a few street names, but other than the one or two that can still be seen on a map today, the other street names had changed.

After several hours pouring over old maps of the village which I found on the internet, looking for “landmarks” in the census documents (such as churches and pubs) which might still be in the same location today, and attempting to determine the route which the census enumerators had taken in each census, I gave her reference points in relation to the three non-conformist churches in the town. However, with the passing of time, many of the older houses have been knocked down to make way for much larger, more modern homes, and it is difficult to determine how many dwellings were removed in the process. It therefore appears to be unlikely that the actual houses in which they lived can be pinpointed with any degree of certainty.

My mother-in-law later reported that someone in the village had told her that there were no names on the streets, or house numbers, until the 1960s. (Hence the English custom of naming a home, to distinguish it from all the others.) She came away with a treasure-trove of photographs of the village, along with some possibilities for the houses in which my ancestors had lived, based on the census documents, but it appears that it may be impossible to identify them with any degree of certainty. The village green, however, still contains virtually all of the same buildings that were there in my ancestors’ time, and the Anglican church and yard, where many of them were christened, married, and buried, still stands on the hill overlooking the town. The manor house of their day is now a “care home”. The school which my greatgrandfather briefly attended is still there, and is now a private home. While the exact houses in which they lived may not be readily identifiable, there still are significant landmarks and buildings which I know were part of my ancestors’ everyday lives.

Finding ancestral homes or visiting the villages they lived in has added a new dimension to my genealogical research, and has made dry statistics of births, marriages, and deaths come alive, rendering them more meaningful. These are places where people whose blood runs through my veins once lived and worked. Next stops: Scotland and Wales!

Apr 102012
 

As a beginner in genealogy, you may have found several family trees online that appear to relate to your ancestors, or they include many of the same names. The details seem more or less right with what you have found to date, although perhaps a few names do not quite match, and you did not think your great grandmother had that many children… But still, they could be your ancestors, and it looks like them. Yes, William and Susan Morris in 1850 Pennsylvania USA, or George Bunn in 1861 Dudley, Worcester, England. But are these your ancestors -? How can you tell for certain? Here are three general points regarding copying online trees into your genealogy.

#1 Quality Sources.

First you need to see a quality source for the relationships between people in the family tree online. If there is no source or document proving the relationships, then all details are suspect. And, do NOT assume accuracy simply because there are 18 individuals listing these very same names/dates/places online. Seventeen people may have simply copied one tree that someone uploaded 8 years ago and never corrected – and no one tried to find any sources! This is a major error in genealogy!

Look for original quality primary source material to identify and confirm the relationships between these ancestors and yours. In other words, search for original documentation of births and marriages in particular. Remember that Primary sources are those items which were developed at the time of an event: e.g., a birth registration, or a marriage record, or parish record.

Secondary sources may help to confirm information, and you will need to evaluate the accuracy of details, e.g., from a census, comparing those details to the online tree you have found. More examples, such as a census, a draft card, a gravestone, a village history: all of these may provide you with some details you can compare to online trees. Follow the individual details to see if it is possible that the online tree individuals are actually your ancestors, or not. They will help you evaluate the accuracy of the trees you have found online.

#2 Names, Names, and more about Names.

Spelling was weird and wonderful for many years, as few individuals were educated and literate. By the early to mid-1850s, most people could read and write, and spelling of names became standardized. This means you may need to be somewhat creative about how your ancestors may have spelled their names, both first names and surnames. Someone is not necessarily NOT in your tree because they spelled their surname differently from your parents, nor are they necessarily IN your tree simply because they spell it the same!

Naming patterns may help you evaluate whether a family tree contains your ancestors. For example, it was relatively common to follow a naming pattern in the 1700 and 1800s: e.g., first son named for father’s father, first daughter named for mother’s mother, second son named for mother’s father, second daughter for father’s mother. But sometimes, children were named after the father or mother’s siblings – a very common practice, making it quite challenging to follow the ‘correct’ ancestors!

Maiden names of mother or grandmother (on either side) may be incorporated into a first name or middle name – a great clue to follow. If you see a very unusual first or second name, check to see if it shows up a generation or two back; e.g., Arthur Aiken Lewis – that Aiken looks like a surname to me… Yes, his mother’s maiden name. Another example: Whitehead Joyner… again, that Whitehead looks like a surname, and indeed it was – his mother’s maiden name. Grover Buell… surname? Yes, but I had to go back 4 generations to find the Grover! And in the intervals, there were many many Grover Buell individuals who were likely cousins as well as direct ancestors – very confusing.

And, you will likely find that families tended to use fairly similar names from one generation to another. If your 3rd great grandparents named their children George, John, Joseph, Mary, Ann, Elizabeth, etc. – then if you find the online tree contains the next generation children named Carson, Octavius, Elijah, Nancy, Lucinda, Isabella – something does not match, and it is possible that this online tree is not “yours” because the patterns are quite different. It is not always true, but in general, families tended to follow similar name groupings for their children.

#3 Surname Family Associations.

These are wonderful – and highly variable, as well. Check to see if any of your ancestor surnames have an association online which has high quality research on family lines. Either search for a “surname+family association”, or go to the Guild of One Name Studies, and search through there. Actually, I usually do both, as some surname associations are quite small and run by only one individual. By checking online, I was able to confirm many details of ancestors in several lines: Terwilliger, Graves, Merwin, Rice, White, Vineyard.

Also look for histories published on individuals (e.g., Miles Merwin association), on villages, counties, and more for additional details you can use to confirm or discard online family trees as your ancestors. For example, I was able to trace one line of Rice individuals to a Edmund Rice association… but noticed that his grandson married the granddaughter of a Mayflower descendant! Both lines had excellent documentation and the connection was quite clear – amazing serendipity.

As you can see, there are some pitfalls as well as wonderful possibilities in following online family trees for your ancestors. Never take someone else’s online tree as correct, until you have evaluated the sources of their information for yourself. By taking time to confirm the details, you can be more sure of the accuracy of your final tree, and be very proud of your work.

Dec 232011
 

Many of us heard the stories growing up that we were part Cherokee. Sometimes, the story was colored with a little bit of fiction such as a great grandmother being a Cherokee Princess. Now it is easy to trace your Cherokee roots. Maybe you too, really want the very same. Not unlike anything else, that’s not very hard when you are aware of how to. If you’re able to break it down into simple steps, have a track to run on, it’s not at all hard to trace your Cherokee roots. If that happens to be regarded as a goal you want to achieve, please read on to learn a fairly easy way it is possible to trace your Cherokee roots within just three steps…

The initial very important step is to write down everything that you know about your family. This will be your starting point. Write down yourself, your parents, your grandparents, and aunt and uncles. Take your time and write everyone down even if you are unsure about their exact relation to you. This gives you a good place to start as you move on to your next step.

The next step you will need to take is speaking to older relatives. A couple of things you should take care in avoiding with this are family legend like the Cherokee princess. Allow your relatives to fill in the blanks of the family tree that you created. Get important information such as names, dates, and relations that you are unclear about.

The 3rd and last step is getting the official documents. This is really important because with birth and marriage certificates, you can go even further back in your family tree. With this final step, you will have the opportunity to discover the hidden jewels in your family history. You can also use resources on the internet such as family tree and ancestry sites. These range from free to a modest monthly fee.

Remember, tracing your Cherokee roots can be a difficult task, but it is well worth the trouble. You may even discover an ancestor’s name on the famous Dawes or Final Rolls! These rolls are used to determine tribal eligibility and degree of blood for the recognized tribes of America. Each tribe has its own eligibility requirements, but the Dawes Rolls play some part.

Just adopt these measures closely, like they are outlined above. If you do that you ought to trace your Cherokee roots easily with few if any problems. This method has worked for almost all others; it’s going to in all probability work nicely and provide excellent results for you too!

Now that you know how to trace your , why not get started on your family tree and discover you own heritage?

Feb 242011
 

Marriage records are a vital source of information in tracing your family origins. Long before the details of everyone’s lives were captured in computer databases or on Facebook, the dates of marriages and the names of those married were diligently recorded. This information was recorded and archived almost as carefully as the records of births and deaths because it was important for establishing heredity and paternal relationships. In some cases, marriage records dating back to the 1700′s are available and provide otherwise unavailable information to unlock the mysteries of your heritage.

The prevalence of marriage records makes them an invaluable resource for genealogical research. Recently, changes to privacy laws and new restrictions on personal information have made it harder to locate and access birth and death records. Marriage records, however, remain relatively unprotected and often provide valuable clues that enable you to move forward in your research.

For example, let’s say you are researching your great-grandparent’s history and only have the first name of your great-grandmother. Without her maiden name, it can be difficult, if not impossible to find a birth record for her, even if you know her birth date. You may be able to locate her death certificate, which will provide additional details about her, but may not offer a clue that leads you deeper into your family tree. However, by searching for the record of your great-grandparent’s marriage using your grandfather’s last name and the first name of your great-grandmother, you may be able to determine your great-grandfather’s first name and your great-grandmother’s maiden name. These two pieces of information position you to research your great-great-grandparents and beyond.

The availability, accuracy and type of information contained in marriage records make them core artifacts in the documentation of your genealogy.